US Supreme Court Rules for Designer Who Doesn't Want to Make Wedding Websites for Gay Couples

The designer, Jack Phillips, argued that creating a wedding website for a same-sex couple would violate his religious beliefs.

US Supreme Court Rules for Designer Who Doesn't Want to Make Wedding Websites for Gay Couples

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a wedding website designer who refused to create websites for same-sex couples.

The case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, was decided by a 7-2 vote. The court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission violated the designer's First Amendment rights by refusing to grant him an exemption from the state's anti-discrimination law.

The designer, Jack Phillips, argued that creating a wedding website for a same-sex couple would violate his religious beliefs. He said that he would be willing to create a generic wedding website for the couple, but he would not create a website that specifically mentioned their sexual orientation.

The Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruled against Phillips, saying that he had violated the state's anti-discrimination law by refusing to create the website. The commission said that Phillips' religious beliefs did not give him the right to discriminate against same-sex couples.

The Supreme Court's ruling is a victory for religious freedom advocates. It is also a setback for same-sex marriage advocates, who had hoped that the court would rule in favor of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission.